Paul David Brodt

“THE MEMOIRS OF TH APOSTLES”
THE MORPHOLOGY OF THE TESTIMONY
INTO FOUR GOSPELS

This site is dedicated to reconstructing the Original Gospel by reverse engineering the Canonical versions.

BEWARE OF THE LEAVEN OF THE PHARISEES AND HEROD:

When teaching parables of the kingdom our Savior said, "The kingdom of heaven is like leaven, which a woman took and hid in three measures of meal till it was all leavened" (Matthew 13:33/Luke 13:20-21). Whoever has ears should hear. “Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the leaven of Herod” (Mark 8:15) “For there is nothing hidden, which will not be revealed; nor concealed, that will not be known” (Luke 12:1-2).

In the Hebrew Gospel of Matthew and in reading page 198, George Howard put forth 3 possibilities for the agreements of Matthew and John as being, and I quote:

(1) Shem-Tob selected them from the Gospel of John in the fourteenth century and inserted them into his Hebrew Matthew.

(2) The author of the Gospel of John barrowed them from a Shem-Tob type Matthean text and inserted them into his gospel.

(3) Both the Gospel of John and Shem-Tob’s Hebrew Matthew are dependent on a common source which contained them.

Further, on page 199, George Howard goes on to say, “Number (3) is possible. The Gospel of John and Shem-Tob’s Hebrew Matthew could be dependent on a common source. But, since this source is no longer extant, if it ever existed, there is no possibility to prove it.” Proof, however, the Lord already had me working on. The Chronological Synopsis with Autographic Reconstruction is the proof that such a document existed along with bringing to light other unexpected incites. (Reading that from George Howard really helped to get through the taxing reconstruction of the final week with the trial before Pilate and the Crucifixion. Those scenes playing through my mind like a movie I do not know how many times.)

ANCIENT WITNESS EZNIK:

This is a 1853 French translation followed by a Google English translation of Yeznik Koghbatsi's Refutation of the Sects. (Also, the much shorter church version is also included.)

FRENCH:

Mais Paul, disent-ils, a ete ravi aux troisiemes cieux, et a entendu ces paroles indicibles que nous prechons.

Voici (ce que) dit Paul: (Paroles) qu'il ne faut pas que l'homme parle. Or, (quant a Marcion, s'il est homme, pour lui indicibles etaient ces paroles; lui qui, 'en effet, est homme, est pire que tous les hommes. Laissant (of cote) laverite de l'Esprit (saint), il s'assoit dans (l'erreur des) fab;es qi'il debite, Ettellement il est possede de l'esprit satanique, qu'il ose faire un triage dansles preceptes de l'Esprit saint, extraire une partie de l'Evangile, et en laisser une partei (comme shose) inutile; de meme aussi, (il faisait)des epitres apostoliques. L'ancien Testament, il le niait entierement, comme s'il etait donne par (un etre) insense, et non pas par (un etre) bon.

Et l'apotre dit: Indenarrables sont les paroles que j'ai entendues. Et Marcion dit : Moi, je les ai entendues. Or, est-ce l'apotre, qui croit ces paroles inenarrables, (qu'il) faut ecouter, ou Marcion qui, les rejetant, les met au neant?

ENGLISH TRANSLATION:

But Paul, they say, was delighted with the third heaven and heard unspeakable words that we preach.

Here's (what) Paul says (lyrics) should not be that man speaks. However, (as Marcion has, if man were unspeakable for him these words, he who, in fact, man is worse than all men. Leaving (rating) laverite of the Spirit (Holy) It sits in the (error) fob; are highly transparently flow, and so he is possessed with the spirit of Satan, he dares to do triage in the precepts of the Holy Spirit, remove some of the gospel, and leave a Partei (like thing) useless even so, (it was) the Apostolic Epistles. The Old Testament, he denied it completely, as if he was given by (being) foolish and not by (an be) good.

And the apostle said: unspeakable are the words I heard. Marcion and said: I heard them. But is this the apostle, who believes these words unspeakable, (he) must listen, or that Marcion, rejecting them, puts them into nothingness?

ARMENIAN CHURCH CLASSICS SHORTENED ENGLISH TRANSLATION:

Marcion committed and act of arrogance by rejecting the Law spoken by the Holy Spirit. He did not stop there either. He rejected the Canon and formed his own gospel. It was not becoming for him to do this. for Paul said, "It is not possible to tell the things which I have heard." (cf. II cor. 12:4) Marcion, however, presumed to say: "I have heard."

This is a prime example of why the Apostle John warned in Revelation (22:18-19) not to add to nor take away or receive the plagues written therein (specifically spiritually and otherwise from forward).

Notice in the quote from Enzik that Paul being Marcion (the Mark) not only "remove some of the gospel" [the real parts in John] of the "the [as in one] gospel" and leaving the rest "useless." Further, the same fate leavened the "Apostolic Epistles." It fits with the works given I have received.

The original beginning and the 'at Jerusalem' Feasts found in John were separated from proto-Luke with the "going to Jerusalem" parts as the general outline. (Not overlooking page shuffled between the four in the second century.) The extra "going to Jerusalem" pages are found in proto-Luke/Luke.

Proto-Luke did not have an infancy gospel added to it as that is where the beginning of John belongs. The infancy gospel now found in the rewrite Luke belongs to Mark (Marc as in Marcion).

Keep your Feasts. The Jerusalem Feasts in John and the "going to Jerusalem" sections in proto-Luke / Luke storyline order are different from that of Marc and Matthew. It really does not take much to put Matthew back into its original order matching Marc as they have a reshuffled Luke as a source.

Within the four there are three unclean frogs (Revelation 16:and what is left of the Original and One Gospel. http://www.pauldavidbrodt.com/

Shem Tob's Hebrew Matthew 24:15-16 reads, "And this gospel, that is evungili...This is the AntiAnointed."

Note that in Shem Tob's Hebrew Matthew 4:23 Then Immanuel " went around the land of Galilee teaching their assemblies and preaching to them the good gift, that is, mavangeleo [Testimony] of the kingdom of heaven..." Why is the "good news" called the "antianointed"? What is the difference between the good news and the "good gift" of the Testimony? The difference is the “good gift” of the original account of the visitation verses the four leavened versions that have been handed down to us.

As revealed in the work of reconstructing the original gospel by reverse engineering the four canonical versions: What is real in what we know as the Gospel of John was discarded and what was left was reshuffled into a proto-Luke called the Gospel of the Lord and later added to as Luke. Further, Luke was rewritten into a Greek 'wonders' gospel and a Hebrew 'signs' Gospel. Further, in the second century while all four were in Greek, pages were further shuffled between the four. Within the four there is what is left of the real Memoirs of the Apostles (not the one Justin Martyr quoted from) and three unclean frogs. For more information, side by side chronological comparisons and "The Refined Chronological Synopsis of the Gospels Chart Reincorporating Luke Chapters 9-18."

ELIYAHU:

Malachi chapter four Complete Jerusalem Bible:

1 ¶ (3:19) For the day is coming, burning like a furnace, when all the proud and evildoers will be stubble; the day that is coming will set them ablaze,” says ADONAI-Tzva’ot, “and leave them neither root nor branch.

2 (3:20) But to you who fear my name, the sun of righteousness will rise with healing in its wings; and you will break out leaping, like calves released from the stall.

3 (3:21) You will trample the wicked, they will be ashes under the soles of your feet on the day when I take action,” says ADONAI-Tzva’ot.

4 ¶ (3:22) “Remember the Torah of Moshe my servant, which I enjoined on him at Horev, laws and rulings for all Isra’el.

5 (3:23) Look, I will send to you Eliyahu the prophet before the coming of the great and terrible Day of ADONAI.

6 (3:24) He will turn the hearts of the fathers to the children and the hearts of the children to their fathers; otherwise I will come and strike the land with complete destruction.”

If “evildoers” were pulled up by the roots and burned then there would be no evildoers today. During the visitation, however, the ‘trees’ were only cut down and not pulled up by the roots to leave them no root. During the visitation the roots were left and the branches were axed down to the Stump. The Stump was left as our Holy Seed.

Luke 3:9 CJB Already the axe is at the root of the trees, ready to strike; every tree that doesn’t produce good fruit will be chopped down and thrown in the fire!”

Daniel 4:23 CJB (4:20) “‘Now the king saw a holy watcher coming down from heaven, who said, “‘“Cut down the tree, and destroy it, but leave the stump with its roots in the ground, with a band of iron and bronze, in the lush grass of the countryside; let him be drenched with dew from the sky and share the lot of the wild animals until seven seasons pass over him.”

Isaiah 6:13 CJB But yet a tenth will be in it, And will return and be for consuming, As a terebinth tree or as an oak, Whose stump remains when it is cut down. So the holy seed shall be its stump."

The prophecy of the final messenger, the second son of oil, coming in the spirit of Elijah is for the End of Days for FATHER is merciful. The error of redacting and using all prophecies and messianic prophecies for the first century was an error of Saul (1 Corinthians 10:11) as he thought it was the End.

Luke 21:8 CJB He answered, “Watch out! Don’t be fooled! For many will come in my name, saying, ‘I am he!’ and, ‘The time has come!’ Don’t go after them.

Immanuel warned His disciples in the first century to watch out for those, including Saul claiming to come in His name, who said it was the End when it was only the beginning of the end times known as the time of the gentiles or nations. Obviously, at the End of Days the porter (Mark 13:34) is sent for FATHER is merciful. HE does nothing without first sending a prophet (Amos 3:7) and in the case of the consummation of this age that porter, the messenger to the seven assemblies (Revelation 2-3) is the final prophet before the age of ages.

Initially in infancy gospel redaction, including the misuse of Malachi chapter four (Luke 1:16-17), was added to Luke when the beginning of John was thrown out. Then the misinterpretation of Malachi chapter four was rewritten into the transfiguration passage when rewritten into Mark (9:11-13) and again in Matthew (17:10-13). Take note that the proto Luke (called the Gospel of the Lord) and Luke accounts of the transfiguration contain the Elijah prophecy error of redaction; which is also an error of interpretation. Without the proper interpretation from heaven it is impossible to reconstruct anything.

PATTERNS REVEALED:

Saul wrote 1 Corinthians before he got a hold of the Memoirs of the Apostles (See “Paul, Ananias and James the Just” PDF) and threw out the John parts, rearranging proto Luke (called the Gospel of the Lord) into Luke and then rewriting proto Luke into Luke and then rearranging the order again to write Mark and Matthew. Saul wrote his epistles because he wasn’t even allowed to see the Memoirs.

   * Two orders from two different sources following two distinct storylines.

    * John and Luke alternate while Mark and Matthew follow a separate order writing out John and large portions of Luke.

    * Much of what is written out from Luke is found in bits and pieces in Matthew’s Sermon on the Mount as redactions.

    * Three Gospels: a combination of what is real in John with the shorter proto-Luke as the original gospel comprise the general story line with select scroll pages preserved in the rewrites of Mark and Matthew as the two rewrite gospels.

    * Not one of the four canonical gospels is authentic as they are today.

   * The Infancy Gospel of Luke belongs to Mark as the original beginning of proto-Luke is found in John.

    * John: Feasts ‘at Jerusalem’ –written out in Mark/Matthew. See John: “Passover” 2:13, “feast of the Jews” 5:1, “Feast of Tabernacles” 7:2 and “Feast of Dedication” 10:22.

    * Gospel of the Lord (proto-Luke)/Luke: ‘going to Jerusalem’s – written out in Mark/Matthew and into fragments. See Luke: 9:51-3, 13:22, 13:33 and 17:11.

    * Look and see in the red-filled section that ‘going to Jerusalem’ (for a Feast) starting in Lord/Luke 9:51 is rewritten in Matthew to be crossing the lake ‘to the other side’ (and thus writing out the Feast all together). ‘Crossing the lake’ common in the Matthew rewrite where as Lord/Luke (and even yet in Mark) preserve more accurate location markers.

    * Gospel of the Lord (proto-Luke)/Luke: ‘eating with “ a certain Pharisee”’ – written out in Mark/Matthew into fragments. (including Mary washing His feet with her hair shortened and moved to end to build crescendo. Why was this ‘Eating with a “certain Pharisee” altered? The Synagogue of Freedmen or Libertines alone with their rabbis after they were kicked out of Rome settled around the Mediterranean. Tarsus is where Zoroastrianism was Judaized into Mithraism. Some of these Hellenistic Jews sent ‘emissaries' (apostles) building synagogues as they went to Jerusalem and some to Galilee including Herodian Bethsaida. The “certain Pharisee” is named Simon. Simon the Pharisee or Simon Magus meaning priest or sage as Hellenistic Jews that followed the teaching of Mithraism were called.)

* The scroll pages of Matthew were shuffled around to hide the fact that if follows the same order as Mark.

* Look and see the patterns of how John and Lord/Luke alternate as the storyline of source number one. See how Mark and Matthew follow another order from source number two – some other source. See how John alternates with Lord/Luke, yet the order of Mark/Matthew write John out and change the order of events.

* Further, see how from the beginning of the versions that John and Lord alternate while Luke and Matthew have infancy gospels. Many have wondered why mark seems so chopped up and seems to be missing a beginning. The answer is that the infancy gospel of Luke is really the infancy gospel of Mark!

* Even further, see how the Gospel According to John fits the order of the Gospel of the Lord where Luke is flipped around (not matching up with John and thus writing John out) and can match up with Mark/Matthew.

* See how Luke has more 'going to Jerusalem' sections than Mark/Matthew. See how John has the 'at Jerusalem' sections that the source of Mark and Matthew has written out.

* See how the 'eating with the Pharisees' sections in Lord/Luke have been rewritten or written out in Mark/Matthew. See how the foot washing in Lord/Luke chapter 7 is likewise written out and that material is added to the end in Mark/Matthew.

* In like manner, see the pattern of redactions from beginning to end and end to beginning in order to either make Lord/Luke match up with Mark/Matthew, add confusion and discredit what is real and or to rewrite gospel into novel – building the crescendo as seen in Mark/Matthew.

* See how most of the material in Matthew's Sermon on the Mound is found in the redaction area of Luke between the end of chapter 9 through 18:14.

* Likewise, see how much of Matthew chapter 10 is taken from the Sending of the Seventy as. These two sections, Matthew chapter 5-7 and 10, is material taken from the storyline of source number one that source number two in Mark/Matthew discarded and wrote out.

* Likewise, source number two in Matthew has many Parables of the Kingdom that are not found in Lord/Luke(, but are found in the Gospel of Thomas). These parables were stolen by source number two even as the 'John' sections were discarded and the 'going to Jerusalem' sections were shuffled together.

* Know that pages were shuffled between the gospel versions in the second century as more pages were shuffled not only within any given account, but also between them. See that John 21 is an interpolation of the calling of the disciples into full-time service found in Lord/Luke 5:1-11.

* Also, see that the Gospel of Peter (will be included in the Synopsis) reads right into the interpolation of John 21 as both of these initially belonged to Mark or Matthew. However, seeing the patterns that Mark is 'wonders' for the Greeks and Matthew is 'signs' for the Judeans, the conclusion is that the Gospel of Peter with its 'signs' coupled with John 21 belongs to Matthew.

   * Mark and Matthew share many pages that are duplicates or interpolated duplicates of one another.

    * The Gospel of Peter fragment with it’s ‘signs’ from the Trial of Pilate to the Resurrection once was part of Matthew and what is in Matthew now in those passages is an interpolated duplicate of Mark.

    * The Gospel of Peter flows right into the redaction of John 20:30-21:25; which is a two-page interpolation of the one scroll page Lord/Luke 5:1-11 “fishers of men” passage.

* There are scroll pages in John that have been redacted from Matthew (i.e. "Simon Peter" passages with the Gospel of Peter being part of proto-Matthew/Long Mark).

* The Acts of the Apostles chapters 1:4-2:47 used to be the end of the Memoirs of the Apostles as it covers through to the Ascension, thus completing the Testimony of the visitation.

Luke "to(wards)/at Jerusalem"passages from chapters 9 through 19 in what is traditionally thought of being going to or taking up to one year in going to Jerusalem for the final week:

*) 9:31 / Mark 9:31 / Matthew 17:22-23

A) 9:51, 53; John "Passover" 2:13.

B1) 13:22b

B2) 13:33

C) 17:11

*) 18:31 / Mark 10:32 / Matthew 20:17

*) 19:11 – Matthew 25:14

*) 19:28 / Mark 11:1a / Matthew 21:1a

John Feasts 'at Jerusalem along with the feeding of the 5,000 Passover':

A) Luke 9:51; John "Passover" 2:13.

x) "feast of the Jews" 5:1.

*) "Passover" 6:1-14 Feeding of the 5,000 / Luke 9:10-17 / Mark 6:32-44 / Matthew 14:13-21

y) "Feast of Tabernacles" 7:2-.

z) "Feast of Dedication" 10:22-.

Since all "to Jerusalem parts of Luke are crammed together inbetween chapters 9-19 -- in order to find where those parts authentically belong (since no actual full document of the Gospel of the Lord remains -- as it is a more authentic version of Luke as part of the original (autograph) gospel).

Mark/Matthew order along with the order tradition has handed down to us is followed originally. Then after Luke chapters 9-18:14 were rightly divided in finding the original scroll page breaks, those pages where piece by piece reverse engineered back into place.

OUTLINE OF THE VISITATION

Daniel 9:24-27 lets us know that the Messiah would be anointed for 3 and ½ years (or ½ of a ‘week of years’ of the seventieth week of years from the rebuilding of Temple after the Babylonian captivity). The Testimony or Gospel story covers this 3 and ½ years. In brief, it starts with the anointing of Immanuel by John the Baptist is at the start of that last and seventieth ‘week of years’ followed by the Temptation. Then there is a gap of over a year when some of the disciples were invited by Immanuel to accompany Him to the first recorded Passover in Jerusalem. The second Passover covered is at the Feeding of the 5,000. After John the Baptist is beheaded, Immanuel’s ministry kicks into high gear culminating in the Feasts of Tabernacles and Dedication, and wintering in the Wilderness of Ephraim before the final week. Thus, what we have recorded is the final three Passovers (two years) of the Holy One’s visitation ending in the Passion.

GETTING BACK TO THE FOUNDATION

John 17:17 ¶ Sanctify them in your truth. Your word is truth.

John 15:3 You are already pruned clean because of the word which I have spoken to you.

John 17:20 ¶ Not for these only do I pray, but for those also who believe in me through their word,

John 16:13 However when he, the Spirit of truth, has come, he will guide you into all truth, for he will not speak from himself; but whatever he hears, he will speak. He will declare to you things that are coming.

John 14: 24 He who doesn’t love me doesn’t keep my words. The word which you hear isn’t mine, but the Father’s who sent me.
John 15: 23 He who hates me, hates my Father also.

Going back to the first century to when the foundation was laid and see what is its Testimony of the First Gospel. First coming brought the cornerstone and that cornerstone laid the foundation of the Testimony sealed in the Twelve before He laid down His life for his friends. Restore the foundation of the Testimony He spoke that our Savior sealed in His Twelve Apostles.

Revelations 21:14 HNV - The wall of the city had twelve foundations, and on them twelve names of the twelve Apostles of the Lamb.

Acts 1:21 "Of the men therefore who have accompanied us all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, 22 beginning from the baptism of John, to the day that he was received up from us, of these one must become a witness with us of his resurrection." 26 They drew lots for them, and the lot fell on Matthias, and he was numbered with the eleven apostles.

Revelation 21:19 HNV - The foundations of the city's wall were adorned with all kinds of precious stones. The first foundation was jasper; the second, sapphire; the third, chalcedony; the fourth, yahalom;

John 14:26 HNV - I will pray to the Father, and he will give you another Counselor, that he may be with you forever [literally “consummation” as in “consummation of the age” -- to the end of the age (time of the gentiles)],

John 14:26 HNV - But the Counselor, the Ruach HaKodesh, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things, and will remind you of all that I said to you.

John 15:27 HNV - You will also testify, because you have been with me from the beginning.

Matthew 26:75 And Peter remembered the word of Jesus who had said to him, "Before the rooster crows, you will deny Me three times." So he went out and wept bitterly.

Luke 22:61 And the Lord turned and looked at Peter. And Peter remembered the word of the Lord, how He had said to him, "Before the rooster crows, you will deny Me three times."

Luke 24:8 And they remembered His words.

John 2:17 Then His disciples remembered that it was written, "Zeal for Your house has eaten Me up."

John 2:22 Therefore, when He had risen from the dead, His disciples remembered that He had said this to them; and they believed the Scripture and the word which Immanuel had said.

John 12:16 His disciples did not understand these things at first; but when Immanuel was glorified, then they remembered that these things were written about Him and that they had done these things to Him.

John 17:6b HNV -They were yours, and you have given them to me. They have kept your word.

John 17:8a HNV - for the words which you have given me I have given to them, and they received them,

John 17:14a HNV - I have given them your word.

John 17:20 HNV - Not for these only do I pray, but for those also who believe in me through their word,

Where is this “word”? The “other gospel” by “those which seemed to be something,” namely “James, Peter and John” being witnesses unto Christ (Galatians 1:6-9; 2:4, 6, 9 & 12; 3:1; 2 Timothy 2:8 “my [Paul’s] gospel”). Where is this “other gospel” by the Twelve? Where are the remembrances of the Apostles who walked with Him. They could write epistles and obviously writing down what Immanuel said would have taken priority. Where is the Memoir’s of the Apostles that the Holy Spirit brought to there remembrance of what Immanuel said as His Testimony – the spirit of prophecy (Revelation 19:10). Going back to the first century and see the instructions Emmanuel came to carry out :

Isaiah 8:16 YNG - Bind up the testimony, Seal the law among My disciples.

Not according to what was given for the hardness of heart, but the law as it was “from the beginning.”

Matthew CJB 19:3 ¶ Some P’rushim came and tried to trap him by asking, “Is it permitted for a man to divorce his wife on any ground whatever?”
4 He replied, “Haven’t you read that at the beginning the Creator made them male and female,
5 and that he said, ‘For this reason a man should leave his father and mother and be united with his wife, and the two are to become one flesh’?
6 Thus they are no longer two, but one. So then, no one should split apart what God has joined together.”
7 They said to him, “Then why did Moshe give the commandment that a man should hand his wife a get and divorce her?”
8 He answered, “Moshe allowed you to divorce your wives because your hearts are so hardened. But this is not how it was at the beginning.
9 Now what I say to you is that whoever divorces his wife, except on the ground of sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery!”

The question then is which words did He testify? On whose words is your house built?

Matthew 7:26 HNV - Everyone who hears these words of mine, and doesn't do them will be like a foolish man, who built his house on the sand.
Matthew 7:27 HNV - The rain came down, the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat on that house; and it fell -- and great was its fall."

VISION

   Get back to the foundation laid by our Redeemer in His Twelve Apostles.   This foundation of the Twelve was laid by the Lamb as He walked with them during the visitation. Speaking to the Apostles in John 14:26 that the Holy Spirit will "bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you."

    The foundation laid is in the "Memories of the Apostles" mentioned by Justin Martyr. The "Memoirs" is the name of the original Gospel that Justin Martyr ‘barrowed’ for version he quoted from. The words He spoke to the Twelve are evoked by His Holy Spirit from the memories of what our Redeemer said to the Apostles He choose and walked with as He walked in the flesh (John 14:26 and 15:27). (Also, see John 14:24, 30; 15:3, 16:3, 11, 13; 17:17 and 20).

    What did He say or not say? How and when did He speak what He did say as He walked in the time of His visitation?   The "Memoirs" of the Twelve Apostles of Lamb are being reverse engineered from the four Canonical versions.

    Make no mistake, Matthias took the place of Judas (Acts 1:26). Matthias met the qualifications of an Apostle (Acts 1:21-22) having walked with the Son of Man from the time of His immersion until His ascension -- there was no mistake. There is no other foundation. There are only Twelve Foundations of the Lamb and not thirteen.

“The wall of the city was built on twelve foundation-stones, and on these were the twelve names of the twelve emissaries of the Lamb” (Revelation of Immanuel Messiah 21:14).

On whose foundation have you built (Luke 6:47-49; Matthew 7:24-27)? Have we built wisely or foolishly? The Lord laid the Foundation in those He walked with while on this earth. The Holy Spirit bringing to remembrance (John 14:26) to the Foundation everything He said while He was with them from the beginning to the end. The earliest mention naming any gospel is through Justin Martyr who only spoke of the Memoirs of the Apostles. This is our Foundation our Savior laid and it is being reconstructed (what is left of it) by reverse engineering it from the leavened that the woman has hidden in the canonical versions of bread fed to us.

PROLOGUE

While looking for the end I found the beginning. The work led back to the similarities and variations between Matthew chapters 24-25, Mark chapter 13 and Luke chapters 21. What did Immanuel prophesy during His visitation? Before the ‘Red Letters’ could be incorporated into the project, I had to get down to the bottom of the synoptic (and thus, gospel) problem before prophecies were confirmed to be spoken by our Savior or not. The whole pattern had to be measured down to the foundation. Measuring Matthew chapters 24-25, Mark chapter 13 and Luke chapters 21 alone would be like squaring up the windows in a house without know if the walls themselves were true or not. There are more variations between the four canonical versions by far then there are variations between text types. John, Luke, Mark and Matthew had to be laid out, lined up and the patterns measured.

It comes down to the prophecies through the Prophets telling us how it was going to happen verses the witnesses of men telling us how it happened. The Prophets are our clock unto the age of ages. Without the correct interpretation it is impossible to reconstruct anything.

Getting down to the bottom of the synoptic (and thus, gospel) problem before prophecies were confirmed to be spoken by our Savior or not. What did Immanuel say and how did He say it and what happened to Him during His visitation. The whole pattern had to be measured down to the foundation. Measuring four chapters alone would be like squaring up the windows in a house without knowing if the walls themselves were true or not. There is only one way it all fits together. And, there was only one way to find that out: take the four canonical gospels and lay them all out side by side in chronological order.

Consider or imagine if you will, that you have been informed that if you take the gospels and find the original page breaks (roughly 15 verses per scroll page) and you lined up the passages that the gospels would line up back into their original order exposing how the first gospel became the four we know today.

Consider if you were informed that Luke and Matthew were shuffled by scroll page (roughly 15 verses per scroll page -- usually less for Luke and usually more for Matthew) and that if you lined up the content then the pages would dove tail back into their original orders. And, that the mandate was that it had to be done by finding the original page breaks to find the pages as they were at the time(s) that they were shuffled. By scroll page they were shuffled and by scroll page they have been reverse engineered revealing the sources and morphology of the Gospels The passages are labeled and lined up and or color coordinated revealing the pages as they were when they were shuffled in the first and second centuries.

DIFFERENCE

There are gospel harmony charts and chronological gospels out there, but they follow a Luke for order of events (priority). They usually have a chart and a gospel based on Luke. But, why base a reconstruction off of the last gospel written and the one that contradicts itself? Charts paired with reconstructions are out there; however, in order for a reconstruction to work, it must be in agreement with the gospels all laid out in a synopsis where the passages are side by side in chronological order. (1) The chart must agree with (2) a chronological synopsis and from that get (3) the reconstruction. These must be in agreement and agree with the proper interpretation of the TaNaK (Books of Moses, the Prophets, and the Writings) and the Revelation of Immanuel Messiah. Then they can stand alone and stand true and stand as One. Without the correct interpretation it is impossible to reconstruct anything. Textual variants come in at (4) because there are many more discrepancies between the canonical gospels themselves then there is between text-types.

METHOD PART ONE:
MATTHEW AND MARK OF THE SAME ORDER

Heavenly mandate: Content before location. Line up the passages first with location secondary and to be taken with salt.

Proper order of the content reveals the greater depth of the context:

1) Break the gospels down into parts.
2) Set the parts back in chronological order.
3) Line up the parts.
4) Contradictions.
5) Additions.
6) Alterations.
7) Measure the patterns.

Order of work:

1) Put Matthew in original order; which lines up to Mark.

2) Line up John and Luke to Chronological Matthew/Mark; which shows the Luke redaction areas of chapters 9-18.
3) Reincorporate Luke 9-18 back into the story and time line. (along with revamping the order of John); which also discloses that Mark looses its priority and Matthew looses its primacy.
4) Reassess the real form the rewrite to make further refinements to the Refined Chart before moving on to the Refined Synopsis.

In the first synopsis, the Gospel of Mark is laid out in one column and Matthew in a column next to it. To do this first move Matthew 8:5-22 after 4:54. Second, move Matthew 9:1-17 and 12:1-13:53 respectively after 8:4. And, that is all it takes to line up Matthew to its original order; which follows the order of Mark. The only discrepancy is Matthew 13:54-58 and Mark 6:2b-6 as a scribal error due to the shuffling of Matthew from its original order to hide the fact that it shares the order of Mark.

{Matthew 3:1-8:4 = Mark 1:1-45;

Matthew 9:1-17 = Mark 2:1-22;

Matthew 12:1-13:53= Mark 2:23-4:35;

Matthew 8:23-9:35 = Mark 4:35-6:2a;

Matthew 13:54-58 = Mark 6:2b-6;

Matthew 10:1-11:30 = Mark 6:7-13;

Matthew 13:54-58 = Mark 6:2-6;

Matthew 14:1-28:20 = Mark 6:14-16:20.}

See the "CHRONOLOGICAL MATTHEW & MARK SYNOPSIS" PDF to see Matthew in its original order laid out and lined up next to Mark. PDF has been updated with Note column left blank, finally worked around a bug that kept making the contents chart go blank when converting from PageMaker to PDF, and straightened up the document over all.

   With the chart and chronological comparison in mind, most scribes and scholars consider Mark as priority (chronologically correct). If a reconstruction is to be made then we have to start with Mark.

    In order to get down to the truth of the matter, the Canonical Gospels have to be put in chronological order and lined-up to measure what patterns emerge. A passage may read one way in Matthew and Mark and another way in Luke. A passage may read one way in Matthew and another way in Mark and Luke, or all three may have a different reading. Obviously, they cannot all be right. God does not contradict Himself because He cannot lie. There can truly be one right answer to the dilemma. In some occasional cases, both answers are right when put together in proper order. For the most part there can only be one original answer. Which words are of the Word and which are a bad imitation? Let the words define themselves and lock themselves into place.

    I began the work before me to begin breaking down the gospels into their parts to line them up for comparison. Each gospel had to be looked at in its parts. The main part of each gospel was separated into was infancy narratives, genealogy books, testimony of John the Baptist, ministry and final week. The ministry was further broken down to before and after the Feeding of the 5,000 and so on with smaller and smaller sections along the timeline. The final week of each gospel had to be viewed as a separate piece of work.

    Reading the Gospel of Mark, it is a short, choppy layout with tight markers as to the order of locations during Immanuel’s ministry. Focusing on the ministry up to the final week, I started to sort Mark and Matthew into components by passage to get to a rough draft chart close enough for the initial layout into the computer. From the start, differences between even parallel verses exposed more contradictions and alterations between the texts.

    With Mark as priority, I began lining up the ministry in Matthew to Mark since they both appear to start off the same as far as the ministry up to the final week is concerned. Aligning Matthew to Mark was tricky since Matthew had been out of order for so long and ‘correctors’ had smoothed the text over or had cut text out to make more sense. So, I had to look at Matthew in terms of action instead of location and match up Matthew to Mark accordingly. The current chapter numbering system was used as an initial guild to finding the correct page breaks.

    Once these breaks became visible, the pages dove-tailed beautifully in most cases. In some cases the page breakdown was more ambiguous do to ‘correctors’ errors or just simple scribal errors of starting the wrong page and so forth. I had to follow the premise that the chart, the comparison in the synopsis and the Testimony in the reconstruction all had to be in agreement, and yet be able to stand on their own.

    Breaking a lot of ground with Matthew back in order, it was apparent that Matthew was shuffled by pages with 14-22 verses per page. Now, one may ask, “How could it be shuffled by page when 14-22 verses are only half of a page?” Answer: Matthew was originally on a scroll; which is reciprocated in John.   With Matthew in true sequence, thus becoming primacy and priority. The context of the Message found therein then took on a more honest light. Luke based compilations only mutilate Matthew into further pieces when it is Luke chapters 10 through 18:14 that is a redaction piecemeal. Proper order yields depth to context.

    The pages of Matthew back in their original sequence also raised more questions. The verses in Matthew and Mark that they have in common clearly show that they are similar, but not the same. Even with Matthew being almost twice the length of Mark, surprisingly there are still numerous incidents in text of Mark actually has more material in places then Matthew. However, the gospels of Mark verses were not added by whole pages. Nor were they by page missing from Matthew leading us to the conclusion that Mark is a rewrite of Matthew after John pages where discarded and before Matthew was shuffled. This shows Mark to be a rewrite.

    Yet, I was keeping an eye out for the more original text that may have been preserved in Mark and or Luke where the verses may have been lost in Matthew (largely in part due to ‘correctors’ smoothing out the continuity of Matthew after its rearrangement. (That’s why the older and more obscure text-types were utilized in this work since they have had less hands ‘fix’ the shuffling since it was done no later than the time of Irenaeus when the Canonical Gospels were first named into the second Canon of the New Testament.

   Other key notes to keep in mind when going through the Chronological Synopsis is the tone of the hands that penned them. The way in which the Twelve apostles of the Lamb are portrayed is one indicator to the writer(s). Yes, there were many things that they did not understand until the day of Pentecost when they received the promise of the Holy Spirit. However, in Mark to Luke the tone in which the Twelve are spoken of is condescending and degrading with twisting of the original or just flat out redactions. Matthew is anti-Herodian where as Mark (and Luke) are mainly pro-Herodian. Matthew (and John) is pro-Message where Mark is pro-signs and wonders.

With Mark 9:20-28 in Shem Tob’s Hebrew Matthew, it begs the wise to consider how much more of the Marc is in Matthew or even which is which? And, if Marc can be found in Matthew then can it also be found in Luke and John? Pages have been shuffled around in Matthew, so the wise do consider that yes pages have been swapped, discarded and duplicated between the four Canonical Gospels.

METHOD PART TWO:
REVEALING THE LUKE REDACTION AREA

   It is said that Matthew, Mark and Luke are Synoptics and many have given demonstrations as to the harmony of the canonical gospels. At the same time, we can’t help but notice discrepancies and missing continuity of the gospel story. Can there ever be unity to the gospel?

    The difference between text types is miniscule compared to the differences between the four gospel versions; which, again, only get us back to the second century. Besides, text-types such as Greek, Latin, Aramaic and Coptic only get us back to the century at best.

    * Have to look at up to the final week as being separate from the final week in each gospel as they have been switched around and text in all of them has been added to and taken away down through the past 1,850 some odd years since the time of Tertullian-Irenaeus in the second half of the second century.

    * Infancy gospels apart from the body of the gospels apart from the passion narratives.

    * Sayings gospels apart from genealogy books

    * Infancy gospels apart from the rest.

...Marcion and Irenaeus, the sixth and seventh heads of the beast, are just images for what the Marc and fifth head of the beast, Saul, did to the Original Gospel.  Follow the paper trail and initially we are told that Marcion rewrote Luke into the Gospel of the Lord by cutting out the TaNaK parts -- even though the Gospel of the Lord talks more of Abraham than John, Matthew and Mark.

    The name Marciones itself means 'those of the Marc -- not those of the Lord nor Luke.  Additionally, they claim that their founder, the Marc (of the beast), wrote the Gospel of Marc/Mark -- not the Gospel of the Lord.  Marc/Mark and Matthew are the gospels with Abraham cut out of them and not the Gospel of the Lord. The Gospel of the Lord or proto-Luke just does not have the additions of prophecies found in Luke that is a pattern carried over to Mark and Matthew.

    What then are we looking at in the gospels?  Missing out of Marc and Matthew are episodes of 'going to Jerusalem, three times eating with the Pharisees only found in what we know today as Luke.  Also missing we find likewise separated out into John the first recorded Passover, and the Feasts of Tabernacles and Dedication in the fall and winter respectively before the Passion.

    Even Shem Tob's Hebrew MatitYahu has to be taken with salt as Marc 9:20-28 is found in place of Matthew 17:18.  This not only makes ST a Hebrew Matthew, but also a Hebrew Marc.  How much more Marc is in Matthew?  Matthew is 'Signs' for the Hebrews while Mark is 'Wonders' for the Greeks.

    The original gospel, called the Memoirs of the [Twelve] Apostles by Justin Martyr and the three unclean frogs of Revelation 16 (including the Long/Secret Marc) are to be found amid the four canonical accounts.  These three frogs have been the three measures of leaven that the 'woman' hid until it was all leavened.  The three frogs that have plagued us for almost two millennia for every generation fulfilling the prophecy in Revelation 13 of the whole world going after the beast.

METHOD PART THREE:

REINCORPORATING LUKE 9-18

Most gospel charts have Luke chapters 10 through 18:14 standing alone without parallel in any other gospel. However, when the sections between chapters 9 and 18 are broken down (into their original scroll pages at the time that they were shuffled) then the mystery of the gospel problem is no longer a mystery. There are parallels in the gospels that give clues to as how the pages dove tail revealing not only where the pages go, but also how much of Luke was written down into a much shorter form in Mark and Matthew. (Much of Matthew is authentic material only found preserved in Matthew such as the parables in chapter 13.)

Mark and Matthew follow one order and lining up the Synoptics displays the Luke redaction areas from chapters 9-18. When those chapters in Luke are rightly divided and shuffled back into place then the order of the story line changes. It changes from the Chronological Matthew and Mark order with a long stretch of the story as Luke 10-18:14 before the final week.

Mark and Matthew follow and undisclosed time line giving no clues to the length of time of their respective tellings. To many Luke 10-18:14 adds another year tot the telling. Reincorporating the Feasts found in John into the story may stretch it to 2 and ½ years if following Mark/Matthew order. However, when Luke 9-18 is reincorporated properly alternating with the Feasts in John then the 3 ½ years that Immanuel was prophesied to be anointed as recorded in Daniel 9:24-27 is within reach.

Some passages may be totally out of tradition, however when the original page breaks are found and the passages lined up then the pattern is all too clear. The puzzle only fits together one way. Almost all of the pieces are in place, yet it is obvious what the true picture of the visitation is revealing.

Luke "to(wards)/at Jerusalem"passages from chapters 9 through 19 in what is traditionally thought of being going to or taking up to one year in going to Jerusalem for the final week:

*) 9:31 / Mark 9:31 / Matthew 17:22-23

A) 9:51, 53; John "Passover" 2:13.

B1) 13:22b

B2) 13:33

C) 17:11

*) 18:31 / Mark 10:32 / Matthew 20:17

*) 19:11 – Matthew 25:14

*) 19:28 / Mark 11:1a / Matthew 21:1a

John Feasts 'at Jerusalem along with the feeding of the 5,000 Passover':

A) Luke 9:51; John "Passover" 2:13.

x) "feast of the Jews" 5:1.

*) "Passover" 6:1-14 Feeding of the 5,000 / Luke 9:10-17 / Mark 6:32-44 / Matthew 14:13-21

y) "Feast of Tabernacles" 7:2-.

z) "Feast of Dedication" 10:22-.

CONCLUSION:

Now with all of that said, now that we cannot hold the plum line to any one of the canonical gospels versions and the version hold true. We also have to come to the realization that some authentic material is physically lost and that this reconstruction of the Memoirs of the Apostles is reverse engineering only what is left of the Memoirs – but it will be enough.

The Revelation of Immanuel Messiah 21:14 reads, "The wall of the city was built on twelve foundation-stones, and on these were the twelve names of the Twelve Apostles of the Lamb." There is no other foundation. On whose foundation have you built? The Lord laid the Foundation in those He walked with while on this earth. The Holy Spirit bringing to remembrance (John 14:26) to the Foundation everything He said while He was with them from the beginning to the end. This is our Foundation our Savior laid and it is being reconstructed like Noah building the Ark.

The patterns are there and have been measured. The foundations are exposed revealing the Twelve who reveal the Cornerstone and what He really said and how He said it during His visitation. That is the Testimony. That is the Ark. "You shall not have any other gods before Me!"

If any denomination or ‘agree-to-disagree’ really knew Him then the Son of Man would not be appointed to be revealed in the last days (Luke 17:26-30). Find the original foundations and reveal the Cornerstone. When we all go to the Head as our only Teacher then we shall all speak the same. The more of us that take to heart what is being shared here the closer we will be to the revealing of the Son of Man.

In the Holy Ruach of Immanuel,

tzuar davyd

Even as He ascended
in order for the Spirit to descend,
At the Sixth Seal,

the Spirit shall be taken back

in order for Him to return.

Jeremiah 23:30 WEB Therefore, lo, I [am] against the prophets, An affirmation of Jehovah, Stealing My words each from his neighbour.

WORKS CITED:

BITTER THEMATIC PESHARIM

The Refined Chronological Synopsis of the Gospels Chart Reincorporating Luke Chapters 9-18

WORKS:

Main: THE REFINED CHRONOLOGICAL SYNOPSIS OF THE GOSPELS CHART REINCORPRATING LUKE CHAPTERS 9-18 (updated 20 OCT 10).

New: THE READER'S ABOMINATION UNTO DESOLATION -- What Happened Between Paul, Ananias & James The Just That Affects Judah and the Kingdom To This Day?”

THE PROPHECIES OF THE
TWO SONS OF OIL – distinguishing the times between the two.

BETRAYER AND MURDERER:
JUDAS OR PAUL? – Read it and see which 'Apostle' "under the power of darkness" "delivered" the Son of Man from the Garden to Pilate and is counted as having "the greater sin" -- ringleader of the "betrayers and murderers" of the Just One. It also shows how the Gospels have been changed because of this and shows which Gospel is correct for which passage and which ones are not.

BITTER THEMATIC PESHARIM:
* Calculate the time of the Visitation.
* Count All Seven Heads of the Beast.
* Paul’s Act of Abomination Unto Desolation.
* The Breaking of the Staffs of Favor (Grace) and Bonds.

Synopsis Workbooks Laying Out the Gospels and Lining Them Up:
CHRONOLOGICAL MATTHEW & MARK SYNOPSIS

Exposing Luke Redaction from Luke Chapter 9 to 18:14:
THE CHRONOLOGICAL SYNOPSIS OF THE CANONICL GOSPELS AND THE GOSPEL OF THE LORD (PDF View).

THE CHRONOLOGICAL SYNOPSIS OF THE CANONICL GOSPELS AND THE GOSPEL OF THE LORD (Print View)

LINKS:

The Gospel of Thomas Page
at the Nag Hammadi Library.
Paul As Herodian
by Robert Eisenman
Yahuah.org
by the late Carl Felland
Judaism 101
jewfaq.org.
Steve Peachey Origins of Christianity: http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/7860 675/
Jesus Words Only
Doulas J. Del Tondo, Esq.
Online Bible
Free Download Bible Program.
Blue Letter Bible
On-line Bible.

RESOURCES:

A Translation of the Four Gospels from
the Syriac of the Sinaitic Palimpsest
by Agnes Smith Lewis.
The Old Syriac Gospels Studies and Translations by E. Jan Wilson.
The Companion Bible with E. W. Bullinger's Notes.
Young's Literal Translation of the Holy Bible.
The Dead Sea Scrolls Bible.
Hebrew Gospel of Matthew translated by George Howard.
The Works of Josephus.

facebook.com/TzuarDavyd

PaulDavidBrodt@yahoo.com

Paul David ben Don Brodt
(Brodt meaning 'ford' German for Brody (Brodde in French), the city across the Caucus Mountains where the Israelites settled after the Babylonian captivity.)

http://www.4crests.com/brodt-coat-of-arms.html

The surname of BRODT was a Jewish and Polish habitation name from BROD in Moravia or BRODY in the Ukraine, which were important centuries of Jewish life up to the time of Hitler. Both places get their names from the Slavonic element BROD (ford). Surnames derived from place names are divided into two broad categories; topographic names and habitation names. Topographic names are derived from general descriptive references to someone who lived near a physical feature such as an oak tree, a hill, a stream or a church. Habitation names are derived from pre-existing names denoting towns, villages and farmsteads. Other classes of local names include those derived from the names of rivers, individual houses with signs on them, regions and whole countries. The name was also occasionally used as a nickname for a bearded man. When traditional Jews were forced to take family names by the local bureaucracy, it was an obligation imposed from outside traditional society, and people often took the names playfully and let their imaginations run wild by choosing names which corresponded to nothing real in their world. No one alive today can remember the times when Jews took or were given family names (for most Ashkenazim this was the end of the 18th century or the beginning of the 19th) although many remember names being changed after emigration to other countries, such as the United States and Israel in recent years. The earliest Polish surnames were patronymic. The personal names from which they were derived were mainly Slavonic, but as the Middle Ages progressed, traditional Slavic given names, began to give way to saint's names, mainly of Latin origin. Surnames derived from Slavonic personal names are of early origin, and tend to be borne by aristocratic families. Some names were changed by immigrants whilst on the boat heading for America. These transformations were usually to names thought by the immigrants to be more respected in his native land than the one he bore. Many Poles added 'ski' to their names to attain a higher social status since such names were accorded more respect from people of Polish extraction. Thus a larger proportion of Polish names carried this termination in America than in Poland.

ABOUT:

Raised in the Lutheran and Baptist churches starting with the Missouri Synod Lutheran Church at first under a 'hell, fire and brimstone' pastor.

Chaplain's Assistant in the Georgia Army National Guard where I became involved in Catholic, Orthodox and Jewish sects. Then Regular Army Infantry -- in particular this one contrite Methodist pastor who harped on holiness.

After the Army, in seeking the Way, I regularly attended Presbyterian, Messianic and Charismatic congregations.

Psalm 75:9-10 YLT

"And I—I declare it to the age, I sing praise to the God of Jacob.

And all horns of the wicked I cut off, Exalted are the horns of the righteous!"